There seems to be serious resistance to using a combative approach to name-calling against our young children along the lines of Abe Foxman and his crew at ADL.  But ADL, ACLU, PAW, and SPLC specialize on a daily basis in a revolting brand of hate speech that has to have a serious negative impact on us and, more to the point, on our young children.

We began Resisting Defamation in 1990, and took its Syllabus on-line a few years later, but intelligent European Americans have not embraced the cause.  We’re not pleading that our version is the only possible version, but where else on the Internet is there a site that attacks back against editors, columnists, and writers who engage in the most repellent smear attacks on us and our children?  We need ten, one hundred, one thousand web-sites bashing back.

I mention intelligent European Americans because IQ tests are more-or-less normed to our continent-of-origin, so there is a possibility that fully one-half of us literally do not understand the need to speak up.  And probably a huge share of those with above average intelligence find it embarrassing, shameful, too costly, or beneath them to speak up.  Why should this be so?

In our local experience, we have materially stung white-bashers, changed behavior, and gotten people who smear us fired from jobs. Just like ADL.  But where are the writers and thinkers who will resist defamation across the North American, Australian, and European continents?

And with our “theory of slurs,” there is no need to whine, discuss your feelings, or claim hurt. Our approach looks at labels as to whether (1) they are contemptuous, (2) they are based on a supremacist claim, or (3) they act to smother our Euro-diversities, histories, heritages, and cultures.  Still, the larger minds among our kin find the concept of speaking out to be beneath them.

It seems that common sense, a ready-made vocabulary, and proven techniques aren’t persuasive to our natural leaders, so I will appeal to authority to get some action.

I imagine we are all aware of the remarkable work of Wilmot Robertson, and the authority and prestige carried by his name and writings.  So let’s take a look at what he said about this phenomenon of silence toward hate speech.

In his book, “The Dispossessed Majority,” first published in 1981, twenty-five years ago, and in his Chapter Ten, “The Decline of the Majority,” he says:

“There are aggressively censorious minority organizations, principal among them the B’nai B’rith’s Anti-Defamation League, which monitor the printed and the spoken word for the most subtle anti-minority allusions. Should any be found, the owner or editor of the offending media and, if necessary, the writer, advertisers and stockholders are so advised and admonished… The Majority, to its great loss, has no similar watchdog organizations.”

Think of that and then think of all the ink spilled, all the electronics hurled through the ether, and all the writing about high-minded theories, but only one anti-defamation Internet-based group is in existence for all of Euro-diversity.  Why the reluctance to tangle with the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture to protect our children?  I’d really like to hear from posters as to why they decline to take Wilmot Robertson’s advice to form “watchdog organizations” especially to secure our Majority Rights.

Stanley Womack

ResistingDefamation.org

Hyperinflationary collapses occur when the mercantile powers-that-be have taken over, and so debased, the economic foundation of a civilization that they are reduced to doing the only thing they can (without actually abdicating to legitimate powers that are likely to punish them):  “printing” money as a last resort before they bolt for the door to avoid their, otherwise, certain demise. 

There is reason to believe the start of the hyperinflationary collapse of Western Civilization is imminent—as in within the next year.

READ MORE...

A white dating service had to come along sooner or later, and here it is.  Unless, of course, it is a fraud, a parody, or a rip-off!  But then ...

Stanley Womack
ResistingDefamation.org

My thanks to reader Michael R for tipping me off about “The Real Realist”.  This guy is a new blogger, white of course, braving the rainbow nation to bring us crime news at the fetchingly named Why South Africa is Crap and that diversity we all celebrate so much, of course, at The Death of Johannesburg.

Well worth your patronage.

... in tears, as it happens.

As a result:-

A branch of one of the world’s biggest banks has been found guilty of racism after a senior member of staff told a colleague she would be voting for Robert Kilroy-Silk at the last general election because she said he promised to “get rid of the foreigners”.

The remark was overheard by another employee, who sued the bank, HSBC, for race discrimination. Ruby Schembri, 35, a Maltese national, reported the remark. This week an employment tribunal ruled the remark could be construed as racist and ordered HSBC and the supervisor to pay compensation.  The case is one of the first to find that a comment not directly made to another person can constitute racism.

This exciting, go-ahead development in the great fight for individual liberty means that criticism of immigration is steadily becoming impossible in the British workplace.  You may perhaps consider such an affront to grown-up living came about only through the wilfull exploitation of some pretty disingenuous behaviour, to whit:-

Ms Schembri added: “I found Debbie’s racist comment to be offensive and very hurtful.  I left the room and was on the counter.  I began to cry.”

But moral fibre has no place in the modern British courts.  And it sure can’t when self-professed race lawyers and victimology artists boast about “Fearless & Innovative Litigation” and about winning “the largest race claim in the history of the UK”, all via “affordable representation, whatever the actual cost to our firm”.

Oh for the days when an employer could turn around and say, “Look, sweetheart, if you can’t handle that you’d better find yourself somewhere else to work”.  This one, I should add, felt obliged to send the benighted Kilroy-Silk supporter to race awareness classes.

Of course, as an MRer I believe we should all be made fully aware of race.  But I doubt if that was quite the intention in this lady’s case.

Speaking recently to a Congressional representative about immigration policy, I tried to explain the problem in terms he could understand.  I related to him my own experience at the Hewlett-Packard E-Speak project, a project that absorbed $500M of risk capital from the founding company of Silicon Valley during the peak of the dot-con bubble.

READ MORE...

CNN and Fortune have gotten together to complain about the impoverishment of “our” society with the explosion of choice offered by the Internet, in an article titled “The extinction of mass culture”.  A few excerpts:

The advent of 300 channels and the Internet has fragmented audiences - and the explosion of choice has left us poorer

Do we lose something as a society if we have less in common? How do we define ourselves as Americans if we are not sharing the same culture impacts?

Yes, there is more information available to us than ever, but I don’t think we are better informed. Niche media will, inevitably, continue to weaken mass media.

Politics in America has become polarized for many reasons, but a big one is the fact that people can now filter the news and opinion they get to avoid exposure to ideas with which they disagree.

Mass culture provides intangible benefits, too. Big stars, hit TV shows and even commercials help knit a society together. Think of the feeling that comes a few times a year - the morning after the Super Bowl or the Oscars - when tens of millions of Americans share a common experience.

I think this article unintentionally pretty much explains the problem.  These guys are so self-absorbed due to unaccountable control over the culture that they can’t see that the real impoverishment occurred with the advent of mass media via fictive kinship.  Mass media fictive kinship created a false ethnicity within which it was possible to commit what the Geneva Convention defined as “genocide”, without anyone taking notice.  After all, if an entire race of people is utterly destroyed, and we still have “our mass culture”, then the loss is no more important than the loss of, say, a brand of dish-washing detergent.

I have been asked to provide the current prison contact address for Kevin Hughes.  Readers will know that he is the BNP member handed down a two and a half year custodial sentence for an argument in the street with an Iraqi asylum seeker.  No one was hurt.  But the judge at Worcester Crown Court saw his anti-racist duty clearly.

Kevin is a man of good character, a family man, a charitable worker and, of course, a loyal Englishman.  He is, it seems, finding that the long prison day goes by extremely slowly, and yet he has been denied newspapers and books by the authorities.

He is allowed to receive mail.  I am sure that not just fellow BNP members have written to him offering their support, but good people all around the world who know a judicial wrong when they see one.  Any MR reader who wishes to remind Kevin that he has not been forgotten may do so by writing here:-

Kevin Hughes
XB4290
HMP Featherstone
New Road
Featherstone
Wolverhampton
WV10 7PU

For correspondents within the UK a stamped-addressed envelope would be much appreciated, so he can reply.

Kevin now has his appeal papers drawn up.  There is good hope that his clearly inappropriate sentence will be reduced.  But his criminal record will, sadly, never be expunged.